User Comments
-
Anonymous
Posts: 57354Anonymous said 4 years ago
Can someone please invent a better way to show track and field results. All this hype over the distance medley and we get this:
Quote comment
1 U Windsor Athletic Club 'A' 10:11.12
2 Harbour Track - Hamilton 'A' 10:26.33
3 Unattached Ontario 'C' 11:10.94
4 Dundas Valley Track Club 'A' 11:17.38
5 Dundas Valley Track Club 'B' 11:48.89
6 Niagara Regional Athletics 'A' 12:06.91
I'm not criticising the times, what I'm wondering is who ran what leg, what were the splits, lead changes maybe? Seriously we have to do better. Michael put in a lot of work to promote this and then it's like it didn't happen (unless you were there) -
Anonymous
Posts: 57354Anonymous said 4 years ago
Quoting: Anonymous
"Can someone please invent a better way to show track and field results. All this hype over the distance medley and we get this:
1 U Windsor Athletic Club 'A' 10:11.12
2 Harbour Track - Hamilton 'A' 10:26.33
3 Unattached Ontario 'C' 11:10.94
4 Dundas Valley Track Club 'A' 11:17.38
5 Dundas Valley Track Club 'B' 11:48.89
6 Niagara Regional Athletics 'A' 12:06.91
I'm not criticising the times, what I'm wondering is who ran what leg, what were the splits, lead changes maybe? Seriously we have to do better. Michael put in a lot of work to promote this and then it's like it didn't happen (unless you were there)"
https://hytek.active.com/User_Guides_HTML/TFTM4-1/html/index.html?howtoentersplitsandrelaylegs.htm Quote comment -
User since:
Jun 21st, 2015
Posts: 72Beaner said 4 years ago
Quoting: Anonymous
"Can someone please invent a better way to show track and field results. All this hype over the distance medley and we get this:
1 U Windsor Athletic Club 'A' 10:11.12
2 Harbour Track - Hamilton 'A' 10:26.33
3 Unattached Ontario 'C' 11:10.94
4 Dundas Valley Track Club 'A' 11:17.38
5 Dundas Valley Track Club 'B' 11:48.89
6 Niagara Regional Athletics 'A' 12:06.91
I'm not criticising the times, what I'm wondering is who ran what leg, what were the splits, lead changes maybe? Seriously we have to do better. Michael put in a lot of work to promote this and then it's like it didn't happen (unless you were there)"
Posted this on the wrong thread earlier but here ya go.
Good thing I paid attention when announcing.
UWac: D'allessandro: 3:17, Patterson: 53, Bellemore: 1:47, Falk: 4:14
Harbour: Napier: 3:20, Yaeger: 50, Were: 1:56, Sergio: 4:20 blaze Quote comment -
-
User since:
Nov 26th, 2014
Posts: 218MichaelRochus said 4 years ago
Quoting: Beaner
"Posted this on the wrong thread earlier but here ya go.
Good thing I paid attention when announcing.
UWac: D'allessandro: 3:17, Patterson: 53, Bellemore: 1:47, Falk: 4:14
Harbour: Napier: 3:20, Yaeger: 50, Were: 1:56, Sergio: 4:20 blaze"
Maaaan, I knew it was fast, but 1:47? After running the 1500 that close before? No doubt Corey is on the cusp of something huge! Quote comment